blog banner
How 2020 Democrats’ fundraising numbers compare to each other — and to Trump

How 2020 Democrats’ fundraising numbers compare to each other — and to Trump


JUDY WOODRUFF: 2019 was a year of dramatic
changes and new trends in campaign finance. Some presidential candidates spent big money
wooing donors in order to meet new Democratic Party debate criteria. Two billionaires bankrolled their own campaigns,
while other candidates struggled to raise enough money to keep their campaigns running. To talk about all this and more, I’m joined
by The Washington Post’s Michelle Ye Hee Lee, who covers money in politics. Michelle, good to see you. Thank you for joining
us again on the “NewsHour.” So, first of all, how does this year in fund-raising
generally compare to other election years? MICHELLE YE HEE LEE, The Washington Post:
There were some major new trends in the past year in political fund-raising, one of which
is the rise of small-dollar donors and the power of online giving that really had to
be harnessed by the Democratic candidates, especially because the Democratic National
Committee made a donor threshold one of the qualifications for making it onto a debate
stage. So we saw Democratic candidates, to varying
degrees of success, be able to build online donation programs, reaching out to donors,
grassroot supporters, just to even ask for a dollar or $5 at a time to help show momentum
for their candidacy. It’s been especially important because it
was such a wide field to begin with, and still is quite large, with so many competitive candidates,
that one or two or a handful, really, rise to the top by being able to tap into that
online donor momentum. JUDY WOODRUFF: Interesting, because we have
seen in the past some candidates raising big amounts of money through political action
committees, so-called super PACs, super political action committees. Those are still around, but they just don’t
function the way they used to. MICHELLE YE HEE LEE: They’re still around. But we have seen in the Democratic presidential
primary that there is almost a vilification of the participation of such donors and people
who have ties to special interests. Increasingly, Democrats have begun to distance themselves
from corporate PAC donations, fossil fuel money, you know, saying they won’t take money
from pharmaceutical executives. And so there have been almost these purity
tests that have been set on each other in terms of the type of money that you should
and can raise from. Some candidates still continue to raise money in these high-dollar
fund-raisers, private events that cater to more wealthy donors. JUDY WOODRUFF: Right. MICHELLE YE HEE LEE: But others are still
raising lots of money from a healthy small-dollar base. JUDY WOODRUFF: Let’s look at sum of the numbers. We had the reporting period for the last quarter
just end. And look at these numbers. Of course, leading off, President Trump raised $46 million,
overshadowing any one of the other Democrats, but not so far behind him, Bernie Sanders,
34.5, Pete Buttigieg, 34.7. Joe Biden, just today, we learned he’s come
in third among the Democrats at 22.7. What do we learn about these numbers, Michelle? MICHELLE YE HEE LEE: Well, of course, these
are early looks at some of the most flattering figures. So, once the public filings are revealed,
we will get to see exactly how much money they have to spend going into the early states. But what these figures released now shows
is that there is a lot of donor energy that is forming on the left that a lot of strategists
hope will eventually coalesce around the nominee. Meanwhile, President Trump is just rolling
on forward with a very, very powerful reelection machine that raises a lot of money from both
small donors and wealthy donors. The top fund-raisers so far have pretty much
stayed in that place over the past — over the previous quarter too. And they’re the
top-polling candidates as well going into the early states. So, they really reflect
just how unsettled the Democratic primary field still is and could be for another few
weeks. JUDY WOODRUFF: But money has been something
that eliminated — that has eliminated some of these candidates. I mean, as we said, just today, Julian Castro
announced he is dropping out. He hasn’t been able to raise money, get his numbers up in
the polls. So, on the one hand, money matters. We know
it’s not the only thing that matters, but it clearly makes a difference for these candidates
at this point. MICHELLE YE HEE LEE: It can drive up a lot
of momentum. For example, the Sanders campaign, when they
came out with $34.5 million today, that was eye-popping. That’s not only the biggest quarterly
haul this year. It’s one of the top quarterly hauls in an off-year in a presidential election. And that was especially remarkable compared
to the previous quarter, when he was kind of stagnating in the polls. And then on the
first day of the fourth-quarter fund-raising period, he had a heart attack, and people
were asking how viable his candidacy was going to be, how this was going to affect him. But he really had a great revival and raised
a ton of money. And going into the next few weeks, especially before the nitty-gritty
details are made public about the money itself, this is going to help him generate a lot of
new donors and donations. JUDY WOODRUFF: A lot of interest in these
numbers. Still waiting to hear from Elizabeth Warren. Michelle Ye Hee Lee, thank you very much. MICHELLE YE HEE LEE: Thank you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *